| Category | Rating |
|---|
| Pay | 1 |
| Respect | -5 |
| Benefits | -3 |
| Job Security | -5 |
| Work/Life Balance | -5 |
| Career Potential/Growth | -5 |
| Location | -5 |
| Co-worker Competence | 2 |
| Work Environment | 0 |
I worked for Siegfried from the beginning of the big expansion in 2004 until 2006. I cannot believe how similar each post is to my own experience. I really can't believe this firm is still in business.
I too was lured in by the pay and the promise of a 45 hour work week - many people were. Two people from my orientation group in particular come to mind - one who's father had cancer and wanted to be with him as much as possible and the other was a soon to be first time dad. Both of these people left great careers with Big 4 firms and were promised the 45 hour work week and a local assignment. Both ended up traveling 100% of the time and working 70+ hours each week. Both left. By the first firm event, all the buzz was about the 45 hour work week that did not appear to exist - we all worked over 70 hours each week. It was such a big deal that management had no choice but to address it. We were told the 45 hour work week was actually an "average" that would work itself out due to bench time [after busy season] being so few hours. Well, yes your bench time hours will be few because - like everyone on here has pointed out - you'll be let go within a few weeks of rolling off a deployment/assignment onto the bench.
People posted on here that in many markets the most talented people were the ones let go first. Now that doesn't make much sense for a company that wants to sell talent - that is what Siegfried does [or tries to do]. Well the most talented people cost them the most money and it's the quickest way to cut costs once they thought they were already established in a market. They were poised to pull a bait and switch but the problem came when the ML in most markets couldn't sell the services at all. So end result was those offices closing.
If there is one thing I'm proud of it's that I did not recruit any of my friends into that mess. I would have a hard time living with that at this point. So many people are now left with either no job or forced into road warrior status which is the very thing they were trying to escape - in many instances - when they joined Siegfried. As for me, I went from supposedly the "superstar" of my market to the whole not being in line with the firm values crap [oh, and that also strangely coincided with being on the bench for 4 weeks with the rest of my office group and not a single prospect/assignment in sight - most of the office was let go]. My not being in line was the failure to brown-nose, drink and participate in the lewd behavior at the parties/retreats. Now I am not a prude - if others want to engage in this behavior I am really not offended...I just don't want to participate and will simply try to find other conversations...but that is not acceptable at Siegfried. Try as they might, they do not have the atmosphere [i.e. class] that the Big 4 retreats and mingles have. It has more of the overtone of a used car salesman convention.
One other disturbing thing I noted recently was professional networking sites with a couple of the market leaders from my old market , they had their Siegfried start date in the 1990's - like '95 and '99. I find this really interesting given that these two came on board long after I did in 2004. The one that had 1999 came from industry in 2005. What is the value in lying about being with the firm as much as an extra DECADE??? I can only summise that they are trying to inject some sort of image of longevity in an effort to try and legitimize the firm. But I really don't know - it's just uncomfortable having these sort of things so blatantly misstated.
The main thing I want people to know is that all of these activities - such as the massive layoffs, office closings and changes in benefits - are not due to the recent economic downturn [as some of the Siegfried defenders have posted]. These activities have gone on since the beginning. Many offices were down to a person or two in 2006.
I appreciate all the honesty on this website - I wish I had known all of this upfront and I could've avoided a big career detour. I too regret falling for their pitch and then not bailing when I realized that it was a farse. Please head these warnings and save yourself the regret.